𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦
📁

Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsidered

✍ Scribed by Denis Fisette (auth.)

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Leaves
238
Series
Contributions to Phenomenology 48
Edition
1
Category
Library
⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

The twelve original studies collected in this volume examine different aspects of Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations. They are authored by scholars and specialists internationally recognized for their expertise in the fields of phenomenology, logic, history of philosophy and philosophy of mind. They approach Husserl's groundwork from different angles and perspectives and shed new light on a number of issues such as meaning, intentionality, ontology, logic, etc. They also explore questions such as the place of the Logical Investigations within the whole of Husserl's work, its sources in 19th century philosophy and in particular in the philosophical work of Franz Brentano and Bernard Bolzano, its reception amongst the so-called members of the Munich Circle and its influence on contemporary philosophy. In short, this volume constitutes a "companion" to Husserl's Logical Investigations.

✦ Table of Contents

Front Matter....Pages i-vi
Introduction....Pages 1-10
The Thetic Role of Consciousness....Pages 11-20
The Unity of Husserl’s Logical Investigations : Then and Now....Pages 21-34
Husserl’s Programme of a Wissenschaftslehre in the Logical Investigations ....Pages 35-57
Husserl Reader of Bolzano....Pages 59-81
Are Questions Propositions?....Pages 83-93
Bolzano and the Problem of Psychologism....Pages 95-108
Johannes Daubert und Die Logischen Untersuchungen ....Pages 109-131
Names, Statements, and Their Corresponding Acts in Husserl’s Logical Investigations ....Pages 133-150
Husserl’s Theory of Judgment: A Critique of Brentano and Frege....Pages 151-161
The Theory of Wholes and Parts and Husserl’s Explication of the Possibility of Knowledge in the Logical Investigations ....Pages 163-181
Descriptive, Formal and Formalized Ontologies....Pages 183-210
Real and Ideal Determination in Husserl’s Sixth Logical Investigation ....Pages 211-222
Back Matter....Pages 223-239

✦ Subjects

Philosophy; Phenomenology; History of Philosophy; Logic

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsi
📁 Husserl’s Logical Investigations Reconsidered
✍ Denis Fisette (auth.) 📂 Library 📅 2003 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

The twelve original studies collected in this volume examine different aspects of Edmund Husserl's <STRONG>Logical Investigations</STRONG>. They are authored by scholars and specialists internationally recognized for their expertise in the fields of phenomenology, logic, history of philosophy and ph

Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Inv
📁 Readings on Edmund Husserl’s Logical Investigations
✍ J. N. Mohanty (editor) 📂 Library 📅 1977 🏛 Springer 🌐 English

<p>I Edmund Husserl's Logische Untersuchungen is, by any standard and also by nearly common consent, a great philosophical work. Within the phenom­ enological movement, it is generally recognised that the breakthrough to pure phenomenology - not merely to eidetic phenomenology, but also to transcend

Synthesis and Backward Reference in Huss
📁 Synthesis and Backward Reference in Husserl’s Logical Investigations
✍ Jay Lampert (auth.) 📂 Library 📅 1995 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>In the sixth Logical Investigation, Husserl defines meaning, objectivity, and knowledge by appealing to "syntheses of fulfilment": each act of conscious­ ness has a meaning-intention whereby it anticipates a range of fulfilling intuitions, whose ongoing synthesis would identify intended objects i

The Question of Being in Husserl’s Logic
📁 The Question of Being in Husserl’s Logical Investigations
✍ James R. Mensch (auth.) 📂 Library 📅 1981 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>This study proposes a double thesis. The first concerns the Logische Untersuchungen itself. We will attempt to show that its statements about the nature of being are inconsistent and that this inconsis­ tency is responsible for the failure of this work. The second con­ cerns the Logische Untersuc