✦ LIBER ✦

Hume's Rejection of "Ought" as a Moral Category

✍ Scribed by Nicholas Capaldi

Book ID: 118070055
Publisher: Journal of Philosophy, Inc.
Year: 1966
Tongue: English
Weight: 342 KB
Volume: 63
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-362X
DOI: 10.2307/2023901

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Hume's Rejection of "Ought" as a Moral C

Hume's Rejection of "Ought" as a Moral Category

✍ Nicholas Capaldi 📂 Article 📅 1966 🏛 Journal of Philosophy, Inc. 🌐 English ⚖ 342 KB

PLEASURE AS THE STANDARD OF VIRTUE IN HU

PLEASURE AS THE STANDARD OF VIRTUE IN HUME's MORAL PHILOSOPHY1

✍ JULIA DRIVER 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

A New Rejection of Moral Expertise

✍ Christopher Cowley 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB

The Alliance of Virtue and Vanity in Hum

The Alliance of Virtue and Vanity in Hume's Moral Theory

✍ Reed, Philip A. 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

“Ought” implies “can”, or, the moral rel

“Ought” implies “can”, or, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm

✍ John R. Danley 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 562 KB

Since ought implies can, i.e., one cannot be obligated to do what one cannot do, the question of corporate responsibility cannot be discussed intelligibly without an inquiry into the range of corporate or managerial discretion. Hence, the moral relevance of a theory of the firm. Within classical or

Development in moral judgment as indicat

Development in moral judgment as indicated by rejection of lower-stage statements

✍ James L Carroll; James R Rest 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 425 KB