✦ LIBER ✦

How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers

✍ Scribed by William R. Newman

Book ID: 116882778
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 192 KB
Volume: 41
Category: Article
ISSN: 0039-3681
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.002

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Boyle on science and the mechanical phil

Boyle on science and the mechanical philosophy: a reply to Chalmers

✍ Andrew Pyle 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB

A Companion to the Philosophy of History

A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography (Tucker/A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography) || Philosophy of History of Science

✍ Tucker, Aviezer 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Wiley-Blackwell ⚖ 139 KB

On how the distinction between history a

On how the distinction between history and philosophy of science should not be drawn

✍ C. Ulises Moulines 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 646 KB

Philosophy and history of science both belong to the sciences of culture: they both study that cultural phenomenon that we call "science". Speaking in very general terms, both disciplines have the same subject matter, namely the bulk of science. Speaking in more particular terms, they still appear t

The history and philosophy of science: A

The history and philosophy of science: A challenge to higher education

✍ R. H. Simmons 📂 Article 📅 1957 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 385 KB

A new series devoted to history and phil

A new series devoted to history and philosophy of science

📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

Entry to the history and philosophy of s

Entry to the history and philosophy of science and medicine

✍ Cardwell, Donald 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 126 KB