How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview?
β Scribed by Todd J. Maurer; Jerry M. Solamon; Michael Lippstreu
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 130 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.512
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Coaching interviewees to perform in employment interviews can influence the interview scores. We describe different types of coaching, emphasizing interventions designed to focus interviewees on core, interviewβrelevant content and to help them convey the content accurately (as opposed to interventions designed to teach interviewees to manipulate their scores using peripheral means). We then study the effects of the former type of intervention in relation to the criterionβrelated validity of a structured employment interview. In a combined sample of 146 public safety job incumbents, a predictive validation study was conducted using scores from a situational panel interview. Predictive validity and reliability was observed to be higher in a sample of coached interviewees compared to a sample of uncoached interviewees. Implications for future research and practice in organizational behavior are discussed. Copyright Β© 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Introduction Depression in the elderly is frequently detected by screening instruments and often accompanied by anxiety. We set out to study if anxiety will affect the ability to detect depression by a screening instrument. ## Objective To validate the short Zung depression rating