𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Host response to sponge implants differs between subcutaneous and intraperitoneal sites in mice

✍ Scribed by Juliana B. Mendes; Paula P. Campos; Mônica A. N. D. Ferreira; Y. S. Bakhle; Silvia P. Andrade


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
350 KB
Volume
83B
Category
Article
ISSN
1552-4973

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Synthetic matrices have been used widely to repair and/or to replace biological tissues. However, there is relatively little information on the effect of different anatomical compartments on the host response to foreign implants. We have analyzed such responses to sponge implants in subcutaneous and in intraperitoneal sites in mice at days 3, 5, and 8 postimplantation by measuring inflammation, angiogenesis, and production of proangiogenic/inflammatory cytokines. The angiogenic response, assessed by hemoglobin content and by morphometric analysis of the number of vessels, was higher in intraperitoneal implants. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in intraperitoneal implants were 14‐fold higher than in subcutaneous implants at day 3 and remained high for the next 5 days. Neutrophil accumulation as determined by myeloperoxidase activity was the same in both types of implants. Macrophage accumulation (N‐acetylglucosaminidase activity) was also similar on days 3 and 8 in both implants. Levels of the chemokine CXCL2/KC were always higher, but those of CCL2/JE lower, in the intraperitoneal implant. These results demonstrate that the anatomical site of the implant markedly influenced the host response to synthetic matrices. Our results provide a greater understanding of factors affecting the biocompatibility of exogenous materials placed at different anatomical sites. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


An In Vivo Study of the Host Response to
✍ Alexandra P. Marques; Rui L. Reis; John A. Hunt 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 473 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract **Summary:** Implant failure is one of the major concerns in the biomaterials field. Several factors have been related to the fail but in general these biomaterials do not exhibit comparable physical, chemical or biological properties to natural tissues and ultimately, these devices can

Effect of implantation site and injury c
✍ Diane R. Leigh; Andrew R. Baker; Mena Mesiha; E. Rene Rodriguez; Carmela D. Tan; 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 274 KB

## Abstract The host response and remodeling of ECM scaffolds are believed to be critical determinants of success or failure in repair or reconstructive procedures. Host response has been investigated in subcutaneous or abdominal wall implantation models. The extent to which evaluation of the host