๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: The radiation of a concept

โœ Scribed by Brigandt, Ingo


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
85 KB
Volume
299B
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-104X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The present paper analyzes the use and understanding of the homology concept across different biological disciplines. It is argued that in its history, the homology concept underwent a sort of adaptive radiation. Once it migrated from comparative anatomy into new biological fields, the homology concept changed in accordance with the theoretical aims and interests of these disciplines. The paper gives a case study of the theoretical role that homology plays in comparative and evolutionary biology, in molecular biology, and in evolutionary developmental biology. It is shown that the concept or variant of homology preferred by a particular biological field is used to bring about items of biological knowledge that are characteristic for this field. A particular branch of biology uses its homology concept to pursue its specific theoretical goals. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 299B:9โ€“17, 2003. ยฉ 2003 Wileyโ€Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


From the โ€œModern Synthesisโ€ to cyberneti
โœ Georgy S. Levit; Uwe Hossfeld; Lennart Olsson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 290 KB

## Abstract Ivan I. Schmalhausen was one of the central figures in the Russian development of the โ€œModern Synthesisโ€ in evolutionary biology. He is widely cited internationally even today. Schmalhausen developed the main principles of his theory facing the danger of death in the totalitarian Soviet

A randomized trial comparing radiation t
โœ Carlos Manoel M. Araรบjo; Luis Souhami; Roberto A. Gil; Roberto Carvalho; Josรฉ A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 388 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

From September 1982 to December 1985, 59 previously untreated patients with Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus were randomly assigned to receive radiation therapy (RT) alone versus the concomitant use of RT and chemotherapy (CT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, and bl