## Abstract Molecular cytogenetic techniques enabled us to clarify numerical and structural alterations previously detected by conventional cytogenetic techniques in 37 patients who had myelodysplastic syndromes with complex karyotypes. Using high‐resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR‐CG
✦ LIBER ✦
High-resolution SNP array analysis of patients with developmental disorder and normal array CGH results
✍ Scribed by Linda Siggberg, Ala-Mello Sirpa, Linnankivi Tarja, Avela Kristiina, Scheinin Ilari, Kristiansson Kati, Lahermo Päivi, Hietala Marja, Metsähonkala Liisa, Kuusinen Esa, Laaksonen Maarit, Saarela Janna, Knuutila Sakari
- Book ID
- 119896670
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 240 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1471-2350
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes wi
✍
Angel Martínez-Ramírez; Miguel Urioste; Lorenzo Melchor; David Blesa; Laura Vall
📂
Article
📅
2004
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 914 KB
Identification of genomic aberrations as
✍
Elisa Rumi; Ashot Harutyunyan; Chiara Elena; Daniela Pietra; Thorsten Klampfl; K
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 247 KB
👁 1 views
High-resolution array-CGH profiling of g
✍
Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; Caisa M. Hansson; Cecilia de Bustos; Kiran K. Mantriprag
📂
Article
📅
2005
🏛
Springer
🌐
English
⚖ 342 KB
High-resolution array CGH defines critic
✍
Blake C. Ballif; Jill A. Rosenfeld; Ryan Traylor; Aaron Theisen; Patricia I. Bad
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
Springer
🌐
English
⚖ 771 KB
Detection of genomic copy number changes
✍
Guy Froyen; Hilde Van Esch; Marijke Bauters; Karen Hollanders; Suzanna G.M. Frin
📂
Article
📅
2007
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 480 KB
Communicated by
Microdissection-based high-resolution ge
✍
G.M. Rice; Z. Qi; R. Selzer; T. Richmond; K. Thompson; R.M. Pauli; J. Yu
📂
Article
📅
2006
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 206 KB
👁 2 views
## Abstract We describe two boys with cytogenetically identical interstitial deletions in the q42.11‐q42.13 region of the long arm of chromosome 1 detected by high‐resolution G‐banding analysis. These children share some phenotypic features but also exhibit distinct morphologic differences. We furt