High-resolution MRI of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3T: Comparison of surface coil and volume coil
✍ Scribed by Bernd Bittersohl; Thomas Huang; Erika Schneider; Philip Blazar; Carl Winalski; Philipp Lang; Hiroshi Yoshioka
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 467 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate high‐resolution MRI of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3T using a surface coil (SC) or volume coil (VC).
Materials and Methods
MRI was obtained from nine volunteers in the supine position with a 3‐inch SC and in prone position with a transmit‐receiver wrist VC at 3T. Coronal two‐dimensional‐gradient echo (2D‐GRE) images (TR/TE/FA = 500 msec/15 msec/40°, 1 mm slice‐thickness, 60 mm field of view [FOV], 192 × 256 matrix) and coronal 3D‐GRE images (TR/TE/FA = 33 msec/15 msec/10°, 0.8 mm slice‐thickness, 80 mm FOV, 256 × 256 matrix) were used. Signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of the TFCC and surrounding structures were measured. For qualitative measurement, visualization of TFCC and intercarpal ligaments was graded.
Results
SNR of TFCC, cartilage, and bone marrow on 2D‐GRE with SC/VC was as follows: 5.3/5.3 (TFCC), 16.5/14.4 (cartilage), and 3.61/3.96 (bone marrow). 3D‐GRE showed similar SNR. Cartilage‐TFCC/cartilage‐bone marrow CNR were 11.1/12.8 (SC‐2D‐GRE), 8.8/10.5 (VC‐2D‐GRE), 14.1/15.5 (SC‐3D‐GRE), and 11.9/15.0 (VC‐3D‐GRE). Quantitative values were not significantly different between SC and VC. Visualization of TFCC and intercarpal ligament with SC was superior to that with VC. All structures show higher scores with 3D‐GRE imaging compared to 2D‐GRE imaging.
Conclusion
SC may provide superior qualitative and quantitative results and can be an alternative in case of difficulty in prone position at 3T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:701–707. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.