𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

High quality Ba2NaNb5O15 characterization and optical absorption coefficient measurements

✍ Scribed by H.D. Quandt; L.R. Rothrock

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
580 KB
Volume
42
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0248

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

High sensitive measurements of absorptio
High sensitive measurements of absorption coefficient and optical nonlinearities
✍ Debabrata Goswami πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 196 KB

Accurate knowledge of absorption coefficient of a sample is a prerequisite for measuring the third-order optical nonlinearity of materials, which can be a serious limitation for unknown samples. We introduce a method, which measures both the absorption coefficient and the third-order optical nonline

Optical Characterization of High Quality
Optical Characterization of High Quality ZnTe Substrate
✍ Yoshino, K. ;Memon, A. ;Yoneta, M. ;Arakawa, A. ;Ohmori, K. ;Saito, H. ;Ohishi, πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 85 KB πŸ‘ 2 views
Tissue optical property measurements: Ov
Tissue optical property measurements: Overestimation of absorption coefficient with spectrophotometric techniques
✍ Jorge H. Torres; Ashley J. Welch; Inci Γ‡ilesiz; Massoud Motamedi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 784 KB

This study examines the validity of optical property measurements by comparing surface temperatures rises predicted by a well-tested mathematical model with temperatures measured experimentally during laser irradiation. Analysis is based on the early temperature response that is proportional to the

Erratum to β€œHigh sensitive measurements
Erratum to β€œHigh sensitive measurements of absorption coefficient and optical nonlinearities” [Opt. Commun. 261 (2006) 158–162]
✍ Debabrata Goswami πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 80 KB

In the above article [1], Fig. 3 must be replaced by the following: In figure caption for Fig. 2 in Ref. [1], ''1.6 mm'' and ''120 fs'' should replace ''16 mm'' and ''95 fs'', respectively. In figure captions for Figs. 5 and 6, ''1.6 mm'' and ''120 fs of k = 1560 nm'' should replace ''16 mm'' and