High prevalence of amantadine-resistance influenza a (H3N2) in six prefectures, Japan, in the 2005–2006 Season
✍ Scribed by Reiko Saito; Danjuan Li; Yasushi Suzuki; Isamu Sato; Hironori Masaki; Hidekazu Nishimura; Takashi Kawashima; Yutaka Shirahige; Chieko Shimomura; Norichika Asoh; Satoshi Degawa; Hidefumi Ishikawa; Maki Sato; Yugo Shobugawa; Hiroshi Suzuki
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 149 KB
- Volume
- 79
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Substantial increase in amantadine‐resistant influenza A (H3N2) was reported in Asia and North America in 2005. In this study the frequency and genetic characteristics of amantadine‐resistant influenza A, circulated in Japan in 2005–2006 season, were investigated. Isolates were tested by amantadine susceptibility test (TCID~50~/0.2 ml method), and sequencing of the M2 gene to identify mutations that confer resistance. Additionally, the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes of the viruses were examined. In total, 415 influenza A isolates from six prefectures were screened, and 231 (65.3%) of 354 influenza A (H3N2) were amantadine‐resistant, with a serine to asparagine (S31N) change in the M2 gene. However, none of 61 A (H1N1) isolates were resistant. In addition, genetic analyses of the HA gene showed all amantadine‐resistant viruses clustered in one (named clade N), possessing specific double mutations at 193, serine to phenylalanine (S193F), and at 225, asparatic acid to asparagine (D225N), and sensitive viruses belonged to another group (clade S). The clinical presentations at the clinical visit did not differ between patients shedding clade N virus and those shedding clade S virus. None of the patients had received previous treatment with amantadine. The results indicate an unusually high prevalence and wide circulation of the amantadine‐resistance influenza A (H3N2) in Japan in the 2005–2006 season. These strains had the characteristic double mutations in the HA, in addition to the M2 mutation responsive for resistance. Antiviral resistance monitoring should be intensified and maintained for rapid feedback into treatment strategies, and selection of alternative therapeutic agents. J. Med. Virol. 79:1569–1576, 2007. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.