𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

High-dose weekly oral calcitriol in patients with a rising PSA after prostatectomy or radiation for prostate carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Tomasz M. Beer; Dianne Lemmon; Bruce A. Lowe; W. David Henner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
97 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

In preclinical systems, calcitriol, the natural vitamin D receptor (VDR) ligand, has been found to demonstrate antiproliferative effects, although concentrations > 1 nM are required. Unlike daily dosing, weekly administration of oral calcitriol can safely achieve such blood calcitriol concentrations. This study sought to define the long‐term toxicity of this regimen and measure its effect on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with hormone‐naïve prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with a rising serum PSA after prostatectomy and/or radiation and no prior systemic therapy for prostate carcinoma recurrence maintained a reduced calcium diet and received calcitriol 0.5 μg/kg orally once each week until a maximum of a four‐fold increase in the PSA.

RESULTS

Twenty‐two patients received treatment for a median of 10 months (range, 2–25+ months). Treatment was well tolerated with no Grade ≥ 3 toxicity and no hypercalcemia or renal calculi. No patient had a PSA response (50% reduction confirmed 4 weeks later). Three patients (14%, 95% CI 0–28%) had confirmed reductions in the PSA ranging from 10% to 47%. Statistically significant increases in the PSA doubling time (PSADT) were seen in three additional patients and no patient had a shorter PSADT after starting treatment. For the entire study population, the median PSADT increased from 7.8 months to 10.3 months (P = 0.03 by Wilcoxon signed rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly high‐dose calcitriol was found to be safe. The primary efficacy endpoint of 50% reduction in the serum PSA was not achieved with this therapy. Randomized studies are needed to further examine the impact of this therapy on prostate carcinoma progression. Cancer 2003;97:1217–24. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.11179


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Rosiglitazone versus placebo for men wit
✍ Matthew R. Smith; Judith Manola; Donald S. Kaufman; Daniel George; William K. Oh 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to assess the biologic activity of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ agonist that has been approved to treat type 2 diabetes, in men with recurrent prostate carcinoma using change in prostate specific antigen (PS

Biochemical outcome after radical prosta
✍ Anthony V. D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S. Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, consensus is lacking regarding the relative long‐term efficacy of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus conventional‐dose external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS A