𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

High-dose proton therapy and carbon-ion therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer

✍ Scribed by Hiromitsu Iwata; Masao Murakami; Yusuke Demizu; Daisuke Miyawaki; Kazuki Terashima; Yasue Niwa; Masayuki Mima; Takashi Akagi; Yoshio Hishikawa; Yuta Shibamoto


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
318 KB
Volume
116
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcome of particle therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS:

From April 2003 to April 2007, 80 patients with stage I NSCLC were treated with proton therapy or carbon‐ion therapy (57 with proton therapy and 23 with carbon‐ion therapy) using 3 treatment protocols. In the first protocol, 80 gray equivalents (GyE) of proton therapy was given in 20 fractions, and the second proton therapy protocol used 60 GyE in 10 fractions. For carbon‐ion therapy, 52.8 GyE was given in 4 fractions. After achieving promising preliminary results for the first protocol, the authors started to use the second proton therapy protocol to shorten the overall treatment time. Carbon‐ion therapy was started in 2005, and thereafter, both proton and carbon‐ion therapy plans were made for each patient, and the 1 that appeared superior was adopted. Patient age ranged from 48 to 89 years (median, 76 years). Thirty‐seven patients were medically inoperable, and 43 refused surgery. Forty‐two patients had T1 tumors, and 38 had T2 tumors.

RESULTS:

The median follow‐up period for living patients was 35.5 months. For all 80 patients, the 3‐year overall survival, cause‐specific survival, and local control rates were 75% (IA: 74%; IB: 76%), 86% (IA: 84%; IB: 88%), and 82% (IA: 87%; IB: 77%), respectively. There were no significant differences in treatment results among the 3 protocols. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in only 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

Proton therapy and carbon‐ion therapy are safe and effective for stage I NSCLC. Further investigation of particle therapy for stage I NSCLC is warranted. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The value of combined-modality therapy i
✍ Steven E. Schild; Sumithra J. Mandrekar; Aminah Jatoi; William L. McGinnis; Phil 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to assess the value of combined‐modality therapy in elderly patients by comparing the differences in outcome between patients who received radiotherapy (RT) alone and patients who received RT plus chemotherapy for stage III nonsmall cell l

Definitive radiation therapy for medical
✍ Kazushige Hayakawa; Norio Mitsuhashi; Yoshihiro Saito; Yuko Nakayama; Susumu Kat 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 528 KB

The treatment results of 84 patients with clinical stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) alone at Gunma University Hospital from 1976 through 1989 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with 10 M V X-rays using anteroposter