One hundred consecutive men with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, treated by modified pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy, were evaluated, comparing DNA ploidy as determined by flow cytometry to surgical tumor stage (pT), preoperative prostatic specific antigen (PSA), Gleason
Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate
β Scribed by Rebecca Arora; Michael O. Koch; John N. Eble; Thomas M. Ulbright; Lang Li; Liang Cheng
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 361 KB
- Volume
- 100
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The Gleason grading system uniquely combines data from different areas of carcinoma in the same prostate specimen. Prostatic adenocarcinoma often is multifocal, and different Gleason grades may be present in different foci. The current study was undertaken to compare the Gleason grades of individual adenocarcinoma foci in a given specimen with the overall Gleason grades (primary and secondary) of that specimen.
METHODS
Data were obtained from 115 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens via wholeβmount processing and complete sectioning. Diagrams were constructed by tracing the outline of each wholeβmount section, and tumor maps subsequently were generated. The largest focus was considered the index tumor. Each prostatectomy specimen was assigned primary and secondary Gleason grades, and each tumor focus was assigned its own primary and secondary Gleason grades. Tumor volume was measured using the grid method.
RESULTS
Two or more adenocarcinoma foci were present in 87% of all specimens (2 foci, n = 20; 3 foci, n = 33; 4 foci, n = 17; 5 foci, n = 13; > 5 foci, n = 17). Specimens (n = 15) containing a single tumor were excluded from further analysis. Among the remaining specimens (n = 100), all tumor foci had Gleason grades that were the same as the corresponding overall Gleason grades in only 9 cases (9%). The Gleason score (i.e., the sum of the primary and secondary grades) of the index tumor was correlated with the overall Gleason score in 68% of specimens. The primary grade of the index tumor was the same as the overall primary grade in 97 specimens, whereas the secondary grade of the index tumor was the same as the overall secondary grade in only 68 specimens. The primary and secondary grades of the index tumor, compared with the overall Gleason primary and secondary grades, were reversed in 17 specimens.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of the current study demonstrated the histologic heterogeneity of multifocal prostate malignancies. Although the Gleason grading system was used to determine an overall score for prostate carcinoma within a specimen, the scores of individual tumors, including index tumors, often did not agree with this overall score. These findings may have implications with respect to future biomarker and tissue array studies. Cancer 2004. Β© 2004 American Cancer Society.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The role of prostate-specific antigen in the management of prostatic adenocarcinoma is still not fully ascertained. Its place in the monitoring of patients who have undergone radical treatment is without question but its role in the primary assessment of a lesion is a point of continuous discussion.
Background. The degree of DNA heterogeneity varies between tumors arising at different sites. The presence of a significant degree of variability within a given tumor may result in problems in the interpretation of DNA flow cytometric findings. This study evaluated the degree of DNA heterogeneity in
Twenty-one cases showing only low Gleason grade prostate carcinoma on needle biopsy were identified. In 15 cases radical prostatectomy was performed with the entire prostate embedded for thorough evaluation of grade, volume, and stage of tumor at the needle biopsy site as well as of multifocal tumor