𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Hepatitis C infection in children and adolescents on haemodialysis and after renal transplant

✍ Scribed by M. Greco; K. Cristiano; G. Leozappa; M. Rapicetta; G. Rizzoni


Publisher
Springer
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
446 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0931-041X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodial
✍ Seema Baid-Agrawal; Manuel Pascual; Darius Moradpour; Ulrich Frei; Nina Tolkoff- πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 227 KB

## Abstract Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important global health problem. The prevalence of HCV is significantly higher in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, as compared to the general population. In spite of the relatively milder liver disease activity reported i

Pre-emptive renal transplantation in chi
✍ Gisela Offner; Peter Friedrich Hoyer; Bettina Meyer; Rudolf Pichlmayr; Johannes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 326 KB

Forty-three out of 204 children received their first renal transplant without prior dialysis. In order to evaluate the outcome of pre-emptive transplantation, two groups were compared retrospectively. The groups consisted of 28 children who received their transplants either without prior dialysis (N

Influence of haemodialysis and renal tra
✍ M. Wilhelm; B. Hanewinckel; F. BlΓ€ker πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 460 KB

Whole blood levels of Cd and Pb (microgram/g Hb), serum concentrations of Sr and Zn and their urinary excretion were measured in healthy, renal transplant and dialyzed children by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Furthermore, before and after dialysis the concentrations of these elements were determi

Hepatitis C virus infection and lymphopr
✍ Nizar N. Zein; Rogelio G. Perez; Russel H. Wiesner πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 34 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

with treatment failures moving on to combination therapy (IFN/CMB). The primary difference between the two best strategies (IFN/CBM vs. CMB-G) was that the CMB-G strategy was more successful with those with genotype 1. Thus, the genotyping strategy reached more people with less responsive disease th