๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Hemodynamic determinants of subdiaphragmatic venous return during closed-chest CPR in a canine cardiac arrest model

โœ Scribed by James T Niemann; John P Rosborough; Peter Pelikan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
614 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6760

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Objective: To assess the hemodynamic determinates of peripheral subdiaphragmatic venous-to-right-heart return during closed-chest CPR.

Model: Seven anesthetized dogs subjected to electrically induced ventricular fibrillation for five minutes.

Interventions: Conventional closed-chest CPR and closed-chest CPR with continuous abdominal binding at a chest compression rate of 60 per minute, a compression-to-relaxation ratio of 50:50, and a ventilation-tocompression ratio of 1:5.

Methods: Solid-state catheters were positioned in the ascending aorta, right atrium (RA), and inferior vena cava (IVC). Cannulating electromagnetic flow probes were inserted into the IVC and a carotid artery. Analogto-digital conversion was performed electronically. Five minutes after ventricular fibrillation was induced, interventions were performed in an alternating sequence. Systolic, diastolic, and mean pressures and flows were measured and compared.

Statistical methods: Two-tailed, unpaired t test applied to equal sample size, linear regression analysis, and multiple regression analysis.

Results: Abdominal binding during CPR significantly increased (P < .05) all measured systolic and diastolic CPR intravascular pressures compared with CPR without abdominal binding but did not affect IgC-toright-heart venous return. During conventional CPR without abdominal binding, venous return was dependent on the diastolic IVC pressure (r = .86, P = .014), mean IVC pressure (r = .80, P = .03), and carotid blood flow (r -.99, P = .001) but not on the IVC-to-RA pressure gradient. With abdominal binding, venous return was not correlated with any study hemodynamic variable, including the peripheral venous-to-RA pressure gradien t.

Conclusion: Venous return from the subdiaphragmatic venous bed during CPq~ is dependent on venous pressure, not on the peripheral venous-toright,heart pressure gradient. Abdominal binding during CPR does not affect venous return. Venous return during CPR diastole is highly dependent on central venous capacitance (left heart outflow during CPR systole).


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES