Heat and mass transfer in a quasi-counter flow membrane-based total heat exchanger
β Scribed by Li-Zhi Zhang
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 871 KB
- Volume
- 53
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0017-9310
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Membrane-based total heat exchangers (or energy recovery ventilators) are the key equipments to fresh air ventilation, which is helpful for the control of respiratory diseases like Swine flu and SARs. Cross flow has been the predominant flow arrangement for these equipments. However performances are limited with this arrangement. A counter flow arrangement is the best. In this research, a quasi-counter flow parallel-plates total heat exchanger is constructed and investigated. A detailed mathematical modeling is conducted and the model is experimentally verified. The temperature and humidity values on membrane surfaces, and in the fluids are solved as a conjugate problem. The fluid flow, heat and mass transport equations in the entry regions are solved directly. The mean Nusselt and Sherwood numbers, and the sensible and latent effectiveness of the exchanger are calculated. It is found that the effectiveness of the current arrangement lie between those for cross flow and those for counter flow arrangements. The results also found that the flow can be divided distinctly into three zones: two cross-like zones and a pure-counter flow zone. The less the cross-like zones are, the larger the pure-counter flow zone is, and the greater the effectiveness is. The study also provides a solution of modeling mass transfer with FLUENT software from heat mass analogy.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Hollow fiber membrane modules have been employed for heat and moisture recovery from ventilation air. There are several benefits with this structure. The contact area is large. The resulting NTU (Number of Transfer Units) is high, which implicates a high performance. In this research, the governing
Principal heat transfer mechanisms in a fluidized bed have been classified into three categories, i.e. solid convection, gas convection and radiation. Among these mechanisms, the solid convection is a dominant mechanism in the bubbling fluidized bed. This solid convection is substantially caused by