𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Health care priorities as a problem of local resource allocation

✍ Scribed by Juha Kinnunen; Johanna Lammintakanen; Markku Myllykangas; Olli-Pekka Ryynänen; Jorma Takala


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
145 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0749-6753

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The aim of this study was to examine attitudes to prioritization in health care among the general public, politicians, doctors and nurses. The focus in this paper is on the types of services from a perspective that is policy analytical'. This study forms part of the wider Prioritization in Health Care Project' carried out at the University of Kuopio exploring patient treatment level prioritizations.

Data were collected by a postal questionnaire in 1995. Four groups were established for the study: (1) a general public sample of 2000 subjects, (2) a random sample of 1000 nurses, (3) a random sample of 1500 medical doctors and (4) a sample of 2200 politicians involved in social and health care administration. Respondents were asked to make value choices between specialized and primary health care services in a real budget situation.

One of the most salient ®ndings in this study was that attitudes towards priorities are context-dependent. Certain dierences were observed between the groups studied. The attitudes of the general public and nurses were quite similar, while similar views were shared by politicians and doctors. The attitudes of the respondents re¯ect well what has actually happened in Finnish health care, with the exception of psychiatric services which have undergone drastic cuts.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ratio-based and net benefit-based approa
✍ Eugene M. Laska; Morris Meisner; Carole Siegel; Aaron A. Stinnett 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB 👁 1 views

Both incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and net benefits have been proposed as summary measures for use in cost-effectiveness analyses. We present a unifying proof of the optimality and equivalence of ICER-and net benefit-based approaches to the health resource allocation problem, including both