𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature

✍ Scribed by Alan Diener; Bernie O'Brien; Amiram Gafni


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
100 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Purpose:

The contingent valuation method (cvm) is a survey-based approach for eliciting consumer's monetary valuations for programme benefits for use in cost-benefit analysis (cba). we used the conceptual framework of o'brien and gafni (1996) to classify and critically appraise health care cvm studies.

Methods:

Search of computerized health care and economic citation databases (e.g. medline, econlit) and manual search for papers published between 1984 1996 reporting primary data valuing health programme benefits in monetary units by cvm using willingness-to-pay (wtp) or accept (wta). we classified studies using both empirical (i.e. who was surveyed and how) and conceptual criteria (i.e. which measure of consumer utility was measured and why).

Results:

48 cvm studies were retrieved; the majority (42) undertook money valuation in the context of cost benefit analysis (cba), with the remainder being pricing/demand studies. among the 42 cba studies, the consumer utility being measured (i.e. compensating (cv) vs. equivalent variation (ev) was explicitly stated in only three (7%) studies). wtp was measured in 95% of studies and wta in 5%. by cross-tabulation, 42 (91%) studies were designed as wtp/cv, two (4%) were wtp/ev, two (4%) were wta/cv and no studies used wta/ev. most studies were administered by mail (52%) with 38% being in-person interviews. value elicitation techniques included open-ended questions (38%), payment cards (19%) discrete choice questions (26%) or bidding games (29%). some form of construct validation tests, particularly associations between wtp and income, were done in 21 studies (50%).

Conclusions:

(i) the number of health care cvm studies is growing rapidly and the majority are done in the context of cba; (ii) there is wide variation among health care cvm studies in terms of the types of questions being posed and the elicitation formats being used; (iii) classification and appraisal of the literature is difficult because reporting of methods and their relationship with the conceptual framework of cba is poor; (iii) the applicability to health care of the cvm guidelines issued by the national oceanic and atmospheric administration (noaa) panel for environmental economics is unclear.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Aiding priority setting in health care:
✍ Jan Abel Olsen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 83 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The paper discusses some methodological and measurement aspects with the contingent valuation (CV) method which appear to create problems when eliciting preferences for the relative social valuation of alternative health care programmes. After pointing to biases which tend to exaggerate the true val

Incidental appendectomyβ€”yes or no? A ret
✍ T.E. Snyder; J.R. Selanders πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Hindawi Publishing Corporation 🌐 English βš– 67 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Objective: A retrospective review of appendectomies performed at the university of kansas medical center between january 1, 1989, and january 1, 1994, was conducted. in addition, the literature evaluating effectiveness of incidental appendectomy in preventing future operation and morbidity from