𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

Hasok Chang:Is Water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

✍ Scribed by Alan Chalmers

Book ID: 120774331
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 152 KB
Volume: 22
Category: Article
ISSN: 0926-7220
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-012-9554-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Hasok Chang: Is water H2O? Evidence, rea

Hasok Chang: Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism

✍ Jeremy J. Schmidt 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sci

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Is Water H2O? Volume 293 || Active Realism and the Reality of H2O

✍ Chang, Hasok 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer Netherlands ⚖ 445 KB

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sci

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Is Water H2O? Volume 293 || Pluralism in Science: A Call to Action

✍ Chang, Hasok 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer Netherlands ⚖ 409 KB

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sci

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Is Water H2O? Volume 293 || Water and the Chemical Revolution

✍ Chang, Hasok 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer Netherlands ⚖ 914 KB

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sci

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Interpreting Physics Volume 289 || Realism and Reductionism

✍ MacKinnon, Edward 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands ⚖ 476 KB

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Sci

[Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science] Characterizing the Robustness of Science Volume 292 || Rerum Concordia Discors: Robustness and Discordant Multimodal Evidence

✍ Soler, Léna; Trizio, Emiliano; Nickles, Thomas; Wimsatt, William 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 Dutch ⚖ 420 KB

Mature sciences have been long been characterized in terms of the “successfulness”, “reliability” or “trustworthiness” of their theoretical, experimental or technical accomplishments. Today many philosophers of science talk of “robustness”, often without specifying in a precise way the meaning of th