𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Harvesting the middle hepatic vein with a right hepatectomy does not increase the risk for the donor

✍ Scribed by Olivier Scatton; Jacques Belghiti; Federica Dondero; Diane Goere; Daniele Sommacale; Marylène Plasse; Alain Sauvanet; Olivier Farges; Valérie Vilgrain; Francois Durand


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
93 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The harvesting of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with a right hepatectomy for living-donor liver transplantation allows an optimal venous drainage for the recipient but can also have adverse effects for the donor. This study compares morbidity, early liver function, and volume regeneration in 2 groups of donors who underwent right hepatectomy with (MHV؉, n ‫؍‬ 21) or without (MHV؊, n ‫؍‬ 20) MHV harvesting during 2 successive periods. The operative time was 401 ؎ 60 minutes in the MHV؉ group compared with 392 ؎ 63 minutes in the MHV؊ group, and the transection time was 152 ؎ 53 minutes in the MHV؉ group compared with 131 ؎ 30 minutes in the MHV؊ group (not significant). Blood loss in the MHV؉ group was 773 ؎ 343 mL compared with 613 ؎ 361 mL in the MHV؊ group (not significant). The graft weight and remnant liver volume ratio were similar in the MHV؉ and MHV؊ groups (763 ؎ 200 gm vs. 832 ؎ 156 gm and 42% ؎ 9.5% vs. 43% ؎ 8.3%, respectively). Postoperative biologic liver function tests showed that prothrombin time (PT) ratio on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly lower in the MHV؉ group compared with the MHV؊ group (53% vs. 65% and 63% vs. 72%, respectively, P < .05). There were no differences in postoperative alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase peak levels between the MHV؉ and MHV؊ groups (319 ؎ 198 IU /L vs. 310 ؎ 110 IU /L and 317 ؎ 226 IU /L vs. 296 ؎ 125 IU /L, respectively). Bilirubin maximal blood level was similar in the 2 groups (32 ؎ 17 mol/L in the MHV؉ group vs. 43 ؎ 16 mol/L in the MHV؊ group, P < .05). No donor died. The overall morbidity was lower in the MHV؉ group compared with the MHV؊ group (36% vs. 55%; P > .05, not significant). The donor's remnant liver volume regeneration, evaluated by computed tomography (CT) volumetric study on day 7, was similar in the 2 groups (97% ؎ 29% in the MHV؉ group and 103% ؎ 39% in the MHV؊ group, P > .05). The results of this comparative study show that right hepatectomy with the MHV neither affects morbidity nor impairs early liver function and regeneration in donors. (Liver Transpl


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Does middle hepatic vein omission in a r
✍ Mustapha Adham; Jérôme Dumortier; Amr Abdelaal; Pierre Sagnard; Catherine Boucau 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 272 KB 👁 1 views

Preservation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) for a right split liver transplantation (SLT) in an adult recipient is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the graft and patient outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using a right split graft, according to the type of venous d