๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Handicapped, disabled, or exceptional: Terminological issues

โœ Scribed by Marcia D. Horne


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
224 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Westfield State College

Often the terms "disabled," "handicapped," and "exceptional" are used interchangeably to describe individuals eligible for special education services. The term "exceptional" is the most preferable of the three because the other two can lead to negative attitudes toward individuals so labeled.

Various generic terms are used by parents, teachers, teacher-educators, researchers, psychologists, and other professionals to describe traditional categories of individuals (e.g., mentally retarded, emotionally disturbed, visually impaired, learning disabled) eligible for special education services. The most widely used of these terms are "disabled," "handicapped," and "exceptional." But even though these three terms often are used interchangeably, they denote and connote different meanings. Terminology must be considered carefully because labels may affect the attitudes of parents, professionals, and peers toward labeled individuals. Furthermore, persons labeled with these terms may feel personally devalued by virtue of the potentially lesser status conveyed by a particular label. At times it is necessary to label individuals (e.g., to obtain special services or funding), but care should be exercised lest the terms convey unintended, and perhaps even potentially damaging, meanings. If "disabled" and "handicapped" are used, they should be used appropriately.

DISA~ILITY vs. HANDICAP

The terms "disability" and "handicap" were defined by Kelly and Vergason (1 978)