This article compares the concept of habitus, as formulated in the work of Mauss and Bourdieu, with the concept of habit, as formulated in the work of Merleau-Ponty and Dewey. The rationale for this, on one level, is to seek to clarify these concepts and any distinction that there may be between the
β¦ LIBER β¦
Habit and Habituation: Governance and the Social
β Scribed by Bennett, T.; Dodsworth, F.; Noble, G.; Poovey, M.; Watkins, M.
- Book ID
- 124051108
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Year
- 2013
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 259 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1357-034X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Habit and Habitus
β
Crossley, N.
π
Article
π
2013
π
SAGE Publications
π
English
β 226 KB
Habitus and social suffering: Culture, a
β
Nicole Vitellone
π
Article
π
2004
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 190 KB
The habitual conception of action and so
β
Kilpinen, Erkki
π
Article
π
2009
π
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
π
French
β 201 KB
The habitual conception of action and so
β
Kilpinen, Erkki
π
Article
π
2009
π
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
π
French
β 201 KB
The concept of habit has an established place in the conceptual arsenal of philosophy and social theory. However, it has not been noticed clearly enough, that there are two diΒ€erent variants of this concept around. The older notion, which might be called the classic 'Humean' variant, treats habit as
Autonomic recovery and habituation in so
β
Iris B. Mauss; Frank H. Wilhelm; James J. Gross
π
Article
π
2003
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 144 KB
Social Norms, Social Cohesion, and Corpo
β
Andriy Boytsun; Marc Deloof; Paul Matthyssens
π
Article
π
2010
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 528 KB