Growth and ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in the mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx)
β Scribed by Joanna M. Setchell; Phyllis C. Lee; E. Jean Wickings; Alan F. Dixson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 219 KB
- Volume
- 115
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
We present body mass (N = 419) and crownβrump length (CRL, N = 210) measurements from 38 male and 49 female mandrills born into a semifreeβranging colony in order to describe growth from birth to adulthood, and to investigate maternal influences upon growth. Adult male mandrills are 3.4 times the body mass, and 1.3 times the CRL, of adult females. Body mass dimorphism arises from a combination of sex differences in length of the growth period (females attain adult body mass at 7 years, males at 10 years) and growth rate. Both sexes undergo a subadult growth spurt in body mass, and this is much more dramatic in males (peak velocity 551 g/months Β± 89 SEM at 84β96 months). CRL dimorphism arises from bimaturism (females attain adult CRL at 6 years, males after 10 years), and neither sex shows a particular subadult growth spurt in CRL. Sexual size dimorphism thus represents important time and metabolic costs to males, who mature physically approximately 3β4 years after females. Considerable interindividual variation occurs in the sizeβforβage of both sexes, which is related to maternal variables. Older mothers have heavier offspring than do younger mothers, and higherβranking mothers have heavier offspring than do lower ranking mothers. Mass advantages conferred upon offspring during lactation by older and higherβranking mothers tend to persist postweaning in both sexes. Thus maternal factors affect reproductive success in both sexes, influencing the age at which offspring mature and begin their reproductive career. Am J Phys Anthropol 115:349β360, 2001. Β© 2001 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Investigations of size variation in fossil and archaeological skeletal assemblages may be complicated by incomplete skeletons, biased representation of sexes, and the lack of morphological features that identify sex. In order to refine our ability to evaluate size variation, we test the accuracy of