This paper replies to the comment by Zaleski and Zech on my paper, in which I examined the relationship between free riding and group size. In this reply, I demonstrate that my original estimate is not misspecified because of a scaling problem and argue that the effects of any omitted variables are
β¦ LIBER β¦
Group Size and the Free-Rider Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of Old Evidence from Churches: Reply to Zaleski and Zech
β Scribed by Jody W. Lipford
- Book ID
- 125293033
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 375 KB
- Volume
- 88
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0048-5829
- DOI
- 10.2307/30027143
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Group size and the free-rider hypothesis
β
Jody W. Lipford
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer US
π
English
β 182 KB
Group size and the free-rider hypothesis
β
Peter A. Zaleski; Charles E. Zech
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer US
π
English
β 213 KB
This paper comments on a recent study by Lipford (1995) which rejects the hypothesis of free ridership. This paper contends that Lipford's analysis suffers from two serious misspecification errors. A re-examination of Lipford's results suggests that free ridership could occur. Other hypotheses, howe
Group Size and the Free-Rider Hypothesis
β
Peter A. Zaleski and Charles E. Zech
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer US
π
English
β 421 KB
On βGroup size and the free-rider hypoth
β
Jody W. Lipford
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer US
π
English
β 96 KB
On "Group Size and the Free-Rider Hypoth
β
Jody W. Lipford
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer US
π
English
β 222 KB