This book describes group sequential stopping rules designed to reduce average study length and control Type I and Type II error probabilities. The authors present one-sided and two-sided tests, introduce several families of group sequential tests, and explain how to choose the most appropriate test
Group Sequential Methods with Appl to Clinical Trials
โ Scribed by Christopher Jennison
- Publisher
- Chapman & Hall
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 416
- Series
- Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>This book focuses on group sequential methods for clinical trials with co-primary endpoints based on the decision-making frameworks for: (1) rejecting the null hypothesis (stopping for efficacy), (2) rejecting the alternative hypothesis (stopping for futility), and (3) rejecting the null or alter
<p><p>This book provides an up-to-date review of the general principles of and techniques for confirmatory adaptive designs. Confirmatory adaptive designs are a generalization of group sequential designs. With these designs, interim analyses are performed in order to stop the trial prematurely under
<em>Statistical Methods for Survival Trial Design: With Applications to Cancer Clinical Trials Using R</em>provides a thorough presentation of the principles of designing and monitoring cancer clinical trials in which time-to-event is the primary endpoint.<b></b>Traditional cancer trial designs with
<em>Statistical Methods for Survival Trial Design: With Applications to Cancer Clinical Trials Using R</em>provides a thorough presentation of the principles of designing and monitoring cancer clinical trials in which time-to-event is the primary endpoint.<b></b>Traditional cancer trial designs with
In 1948, the first randomized controlled trial was published by the English Medical Research Council in the "British Medical Journal". Until then, observations had been uncontrolled. Initially, trials frequently did not confirm hypotheses to be tested. This phenomenon was attributed to little sensit