Graph similarity scoring and matching
β Scribed by Laura A. Zager; George C. Verghese
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 601 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0893-9659
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We outline a class of graph similarity measures that uses the structural similarity of local neighborhoods to derive pairwise similarity scores for the nodes of two different graphs, and present a related similarity measure that uses a linear update to generate both node and edge similarity scores. This measure is then applied to the task of graph matching.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Let G be a graph with a perfect matching and k be an integer such that l~<k< I V(G)l/2. Then G is said to be k-extendable if every matching of size k in G extends to a perfect matching of G. Plummer (1994) proved that every (2k + 1)-connected K~,s-free graph of even order is k-extendable. In this p
l b o simple linear notation systems are suggested to encode molecular structure including stereochemical elements. Both systems give rise to a unique numbering of the molecular graph, and thus also lead to a unique linear notation. Both linear notation systems are extremely compact and require only
## Abstract A graph __G__ is __collapsible__ if for every even subset __R__ β __V__(__G__), there is a spanning connected subgraph of __G__ whose set of odd degree vertices is __R__. A graph is __reduced__ if it does not have nontrivial collapsible subgraphs. Collapsible and reduced graphs are defi
Pattern matching in directed graphs is a natural extension of pattern matching in trees and has many applications to different areas. In this paper, we study several pattern matching problems in ordered labeled directed graphs. For the rooted directed graph pattern matching problem, we present an ef
## Abstract Scoring to identify highβaffinity compounds remains a challenge in virtual screening. On one hand, proteinβligand scoring focuses on weighting favorable and unfavorable interactions between the two molecules. Ligandβbased scoring, on the other hand, focuses on how well the shape and che