✦ LIBER ✦

Grain-size separation of haematite in the <5μm range for rockmagnetic investigation

✍ Scribed by M. J. Dekkers; J. H. Linssen

Book ID: 108741672
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1991
Tongue: English
Weight: 412 KB
Volume: 104
Category: Article
ISSN: 0956-540X
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1991.tb02522.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A method for investigating size distribu

A method for investigating size distributions of aqueous droplets in the range 0.5–10 μm produced by pneumatic nebulizers

✍ Cresser, M.S.; Browner, R.F. 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 525 KB

Magnetic properties of synthetic analogu

Magnetic properties of synthetic analogues of pyrrhotite ore in the grain size range 1–24 μm

✍ W. O’Reilly; V. Hoffmann; A. C. Chouker; H. C. Soffel; A. Menyeh 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 770 KB

Sex differences in the regional depositi

Sex differences in the regional deposition of inhaled particles in the 2.5–7.5 μm size range

✍ J.N. Pritchard; S. Jane Jefferies; A. Black 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 335 KB

Investigation of the optical constants o

Investigation of the optical constants of arsenic chalcogenide films in the wavelength range 0.5–2.5 μm

✍ E. N. Kotlikov; V. A. Ivanov; V. A. Krupennikov; B. A. Tallerchik; A. N. Tropin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

X-ray diffraction investigation of atmos

X-ray diffraction investigation of atmospheric aerosols in the 0.3–1.0 μm aerodynamic size range

✍ B. Tani; S. Siegel; S.A. Johnson; R. Kumar 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 870 KB

Particle size analysis and structure of

Particle size analysis and structure of chromium hydrous oxide sols in the size range of less than 0.5 μm

✍ R. I. Larson; E. F. Fullam; A. D. Lindsay; E. Matijevic 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 811 KB

## Abstract Particle size measurements of chromium hydrous oxide sols using electron microscopy and light scattering techniques were in excellent agreement. Comparison was based on the most probable diameter and width of the distribution. The normal, lognormal, and zero‐order logarithmic density fu