✦ LIBER ✦

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

✍ Scribed by Howard Balshem; Mark Helfand; Holger J. Schünemann; Andrew D. Oxman; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Gunn E. Vist; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Joerg Meerpohl; Susan Norris; Gordon H. Guyatt

Book ID: 116623829
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 117 KB
Volume: 64
Category: Article
ISSN: 0895-4356
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality o

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alonso-Coello; 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 487 KB

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality

GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Regina Kunz; James Woodcock; Jan Brozek; Mark 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 823 KB

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality

GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Regina Kunz; James Woodcock; Jan Brozek; Mark 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quali

GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Shahnaz Sultan; Paul Glasziou; Elie A. Akl; P 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Victor Montori; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan B 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 178 KB

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

✍ Gordon H. Guyatt; Andrew D. Oxman; Gunn Vist; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alo 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB