𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Good public policy requires good science

✍ Scribed by Edward G. Feldmann


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
147 KB
Volume
73
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-3549

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Biofuels: good science must precede good
✍ Bruce E. Dale πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 163 KB

## I n the United States, both the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) are struggling with the issue of indirect land use change (ILUC) and its potential eff ects on the greenhouse gas performance of biofuels. A similar struggle is going on w

Good Publicity
πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1920 πŸ› Elsevier βš– 88 KB
cover
✍ McHugh, Crista πŸ“‚ Fiction πŸ“… 2019 πŸ› Midnight Cat Press; Crista McHugh 🌐 English βš– 135 KB

"A once a year shot with a one hundred percent success rate, Ovucontra has been tapped to be the contraception of choice in a revolutionary health care bill that will cover a select list of medications for everyone in the country.But when something sounds too good to be true, there’s always a catch.

β€œElectronic informationβ€”public or privat
✍ Deborah H. Streeter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 567 KB

Private and public sector participants in the information systems business are struggling to define their appropriate roles. Two qualities of information goods can affect whether or not public goods characteristics dominate; the life span of the information and the analytic content of the material.

Replicator Dynamics for Optional Public
✍ CHRISTOPH HAUERT; SILVIA DE MONTE; JOSEF HOFBAUER; KARL SIGMUND πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 165 KB

The public goods game represents a straightforward generalization of the prisoner's dilemma to an arbitrary number of players. Since the dominant strategy is to defect, both classical and evolutionary game theory predict the asocial outcome that no player contributes to the public goods. In contrast