𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Good modeling practice for PAT applications: Propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

✍ Scribed by Gürkan Sin; Krist V. Gernaey; Anna Eliasson Lantz


Publisher
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
617 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
8756-7938

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are evaluated for their usefulness as part of the model‐building within Process Analytical Technology applications. A mechanistic model describing a batch cultivation of Streptomyces coelicolor for antibiotic production was used as case study. The input uncertainty resulting from assumptions of the model was propagated using the Monte Carlo procedure to estimate the output uncertainty. The results showed that significant uncertainty exists in the model outputs. Moreover the uncertainty in the biomass, glucose, ammonium and base‐consumption were found low compared to the large uncertainty observed in the antibiotic and off‐gas CO~2~ predictions. The output uncertainty was observed to be lower during the exponential growth phase, while higher in the stationary and death phases ‐ meaning the model describes some periods better than others. To understand which input parameters are responsible for the output uncertainty, three sensitivity methods (Standardized Regression Coefficients, Morris and differential analysis) were evaluated and compared. The results from these methods were mostly in agreement with each other and revealed that only few parameters (about 10) out of a total 56 were mainly responsible for the output uncertainty. Among these significant parameters, one finds parameters related to fermentation characteristics such as biomass metabolism, chemical equilibria and mass‐transfer. Overall the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis are found promising for helping to build reliable mechanistic models and to interpret the model outputs properly. These tools make part of good modeling practice, which can contribute to successful PAT applications for increased process understanding, operation and control purposes. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2009


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Input parameter sensitivity analysis and
✍ Theodore R. Steger; R. Allen White; Edward F. Jackson 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 269 KB

## Abstract The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) values determined using continuous arterial spin labeling (CASL) are subject to several sources of variability, including natural physiologic variations, sensitivity to the input parameters, and the use of different quantification models. To date,

The development and application of a mul
✍ Todd A. Wang; William F. McTernan 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 222 KB

A study was initiated which combined elements of stochastic hydrology, risk assessment, simulation modeling, cost analysis and decision making to define the optimum remediation choice(s) for a Superfund site in the southern United States. The effort focused upon the premise that groundwater remediat