✦ LIBER ✦

Good Laboratory Practices: Myers et al. Respond

✍ Scribed by John Peterson Myers, Frederick S. vom Saal, Julia A. Taylor, Benson T. Akingbemi, Koji Arizono, Scott Belcher, Theo Colborn and Ibrahim Chahoud

Book ID: 124311743
Publisher: Environmental Health Information Service
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 531 KB
Volume: 117
Category: Article
ISSN: 0091-6765
DOI: 10.2307/40382431

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Good Laboratory Practices: Becker et al.

Good Laboratory Practices: Becker et al. Respond

✍ Richard A. Becker, Erik R. Janus, Russell D. White, Francis H. Kruszewski and Ro 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Environmental Health Information Service 🌐 English ⚖ 513 KB

Good Laboratory Practices: Tyl Responds

✍ Rochelle W. Tyl 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Environmental Health Information Service 🌐 English ⚖ 639 KB

Good Laboratory Practices Are Not Synony

Good Laboratory Practices Are Not Synonymous with Good Scientific Practices, Accurate Reporting, or Valid Data

✍ Frederick S. vom Saal and John Peterson Myers 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Environmental Health Information Service 🌐 English ⚖ 302 KB

Practice. Burden of Proof. Good Faith. G

Practice. Burden of Proof. Good Faith. Gowing et al. v. Warner et al., 62 N. Y., Supp. 797

📂 Article 📅 1900 🏛 Yale University 🌐 English ⚖ 187 KB

Nichols et al. “Executive summary. The N

Nichols et al. “Executive summary. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine practice guideline: Evidence based practice for point of care testing”

✍ Valerie Ng 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

Response to paper “Systems thinking” by

Response to paper “Systems thinking” by D. Cabrera et al.: Is it systems thinking or just good practice in evaluation?

✍ Patricia J. Rogers 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB