𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

God, Knowledge, and the Good: Collected Papers in the Philosophy of Religion

✍ Scribed by Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski


Publisher
Oxford University Press
Year
2022
Tongue
English
Leaves
361
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This volume collects the published articles in philosophy of religion by the pre-eminent philosopher Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski. The volume focuses on the major themes of her career, which is reflected in the sections of the volume: 1) Foreknowledge and Fatalism, 2) The Problem of Evil, 3) Death, Hell, and Resurrection, 4) God and Morality, 5) Omnisubjectivity, 6) The Rationality of Religious Belief, 7) Rational Religious Belief, Self-Trust, and Authority, and 8) God, Trinity, and the Metaphysics of Modality.

A companion volume to
Epistemic Values, her collected articles in epistemology, this volume will be an important resource for scholars in the philosophy of religion, religious epistemology, and religious ethics.

✦ Table of Contents


Cover
God, Knowledge, and the Good
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
Introduction
1. Divine Foreknowledge and Human Free Will (1985)
2. Eternity and Fatalism (2011)
3. Divine Foreknowledge and the Metaphysics of Time (2014)
4. An Agent-​Based Approach to the Problem of Evil (1996)
5. Good Persons, Good Aims, and the Problem of Evil (2017)
6. Weighing Evils: The C. S. Lewis Approach (2007)
7. Sleeping Beauty and the Afterlife (2005)
8. Religious Luck (1994)
9. The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics (1998)
10. The Incarnation and Virtue Ethics (2002)
11. The Attribute of Omnisubjectivity (2013, 2016)
12. The Epistemology of Religion: The Need for Engagement (2004)
13. First-​Person and Third-​Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology (2011)
14. Religious Diversity and Social Responsibility (2001)
15. A Modern Defense of Religious Authority (2016)
16. Epistemic Self-​Trust and the Consensus Gentium Argument (2011)
17. What if the Impossible Had Been Actual? (1990)
18. Christian Monotheism (1989)
Bibliography
Sources
Index


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


God, Knowledge, and the Good: Collected
✍ Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

<span>This volume collects the published articles in philosophy of religion by the pre-eminent philosopher Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski. The volume focuses on the major themes of her career, which is reflected in the sections of the volume: 1) Foreknowledge and Fatalism, 2) The Problem of Evil, 3) Death

God, Time, and Knowledge (Cornell Studie
✍ William Hasker πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1989 🌐 English

"This outstanding book . . . is a genuinely pivotal contribution to the lively current debate over divine foreknowledge and human freedom. . . . Hasker's book has three commendable features worthy of immediate note. First, it contains a carefully crafted overview of the recent literature on foreknow

God and Goodness: A Natural Theological
✍ Mark Wynn πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

Mark Wynn's "God and Goodness" contains a sustained case for the existence of God and attempts to develop a religiously significant and attractive view of God. Besides for presenting original arguments, Wynn takes careful account of previous work. In Part I, he argues that the existence of God best

God, Reason and Religions: New Essays in
✍ Eugene Thomas Long (auth.), Eugene Thomas Long (eds.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>The first issue of the International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion appeared in the Spring, 1970. This collection of essays is presented in celeΒ­ bration of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the journal. Contributors to the volume are to be counted among today's leading philosophers of reli

God and Morality (Elements in the Philos
✍ Anne Jeffrey πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2019 πŸ› Cambridge University Press 🌐 English

This Element has two aims. The first is to discuss arguments philosophers have made about the difference God's existence might make to questions of general interest in metaethics. The second is to argue that it is a mistake to think we can get very far in answering these questions by assuming a thin