✦ LIBER ✦

Goals for a Theory of Deduction: Reply to Johnson-Laird

✍ Scribed by Lance J. Rips

Book ID: 110260568
Publisher: Springer
Year: 1997
Tongue: English
Weight: 95 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 0924-6495
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008234725870

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Mental Model Theory of Conditionals:

The Mental Model Theory of Conditionals: A Reply to Guy Politzer

✍ Philip N. Johnson-Laird; Ruth M. J. Byrne; Vittorio Girotto 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB

The importance of regulatory goal states

The importance of regulatory goal states for autobiographical memory: A reply to Levine and Rubin

✍ Alisha C. Holland; Elizabeth A. Kensinger 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 79 KB

In their respective commentaries, Linda Levine and David Rubin raise important points for future research. Both commentaries relate to a theme that runs throughout our review (Holland & Kensinger [3], this issue): the importance of autobiographical memory for the self and vice-versa. Conway influen

Reply to comments on “a simplified theor

Reply to comments on “a simplified theory for the oxidative wear of steels”

✍ S.W.E. Earles; N. Tenwick 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

A strictly finitary non-triviality proof

A strictly finitary non-triviality proof for a paraconsistent system of set theory deductively equivalent to classical ZFC minus foundation

✍ Arief Daynes 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

A reply to the comments of Johnson et al

A reply to the comments of Johnson et al. on the thermodynamics of the Heisenberg-Ising ring for |Δ|<1

✍ M. Takahashi; M. Suzuki 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 138 KB

A reply to Rajagopalan and Parameswaran'

A reply to Rajagopalan and Parameswaran's discussion of “A theory for the flexural strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete”

✍ R.N. Swamy; P.S. Mangat 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 336 KB

The authors thank Messrs. Rajagopalan and Parameswaran for their contribution to the discussion of their paper on "A Theory for the Flexural Strength of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete." Unfortunately the discussion is liberally laced with well-known and well-established elementary text-book mechani