Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: Comment on the article by Prøven et al
✍ Scribed by Docken, William P.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 47 KB
- Volume
- 51
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3591
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The recent article by Prøven et al (Prøven A, Gabriel S, Orces C, O'Fallon WM, Hunder GG. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:703-8) emphasizes the toxicities inherent in the use of high-dose steroids for the management of giant cell arteritis (GCA).
The authors report that 48% of 125 patients treated for GCA experienced "relapses or recurrences." I suspect that such occurrences were grounds for raising the glucocorticoid doses used for the management of these patients, which in turn would be expected to augment the risk of steroid-related toxicities. It has been my clinical experience that a number of "flares" of GCA-prompting increases in corticosteroid doses-are diagnosed on the basis of asymptomatic rises in the acute-phase reactants, especially the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. I am thus curious about the specifics as to how Prøven et al defined "relapses or recurrences," and I would appreciate their thoughts as to whether this definition could have played a role in prolonging the duration of steroid therapy in their patients, and, by implication, the toxicities attendant on such therapy.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
al report that filtration leukocytapheresis represents an advance in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (1). I do not believe this procedure is as advantageous as centrifugal online lymphoplasmapheresis for the following reasons: 1. Filtration leukocytapheresis removed only 1.9 ϫ 10 9 lymphocyt
consequences of a variety of compounds that are used may be quite significant (1-5). As noted by Pollard and Hultman, these products are available and used worldwide, but the extent to which they are currently used, or have previously been used, by different groups (in the US and in other countries)