## Abstract Economic evaluations generally fail to incorporate elements of intangible costs and benefits, such as anxiety and discomfort associated with the screening test and diagnostic test, as well as the magnitude of utility associated with a reduction in the risk of dying from cancer. In the p
β¦ LIBER β¦
Getting the public on board for cancer screening
β Scribed by Arasaradnam, Ramesh P.
- Book ID
- 109813019
- Publisher
- Nature Publishing Group
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 118 KB
- Volume
- 443
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0028-0836
- DOI
- 10.1038/443749f
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Analysing public preferences for cancer
β
Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Jes SΓΈgaard
π
Article
π
2001
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 111 KB
Cancer screening: Protecting the public'
β
Tilde S. Kline; Heather Mitchell
π
Article
π
1995
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 166 KB
Idle computers get busy screening drug t
β
Erickson, Amy K
π
Article
π
2005
π
Nature Publishing Group
π
English
β 115 KB
UICC project on screening for cancer: Re
β
N. E. Day; C. J. Baines; J. Chamberlain; M. Hakama; A. B. Miller; P. Prorok
π
Article
π
1986
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
French
β 586 KB
The 4th workshop of the UICC project on screening for cancer was held in Helsinki, Finland on April 7-9, 1986. In developed countries there are more data available from controlled trials on the effectiveness of screening for breast cancer than for any other cancer. Nevertheless, full information is
Get ready for the flood of fetal gene sc
β
Greely, Henry T.
π
Article
π
2011
π
Nature Publishing Group
π
English
β 386 KB
Getting advance directives to the public
β
Kenneth V Iserson
π
Article
π
1991
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 579 KB