Geographical variation in adverse event reporting rates in clinical trials
β Scribed by Svante Joelson; Ing-Britt Joelson; Mari-Ann Wallander
- Book ID
- 101289510
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 154 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-8569
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Although most clinical trials encompass aspects of safety, methods for assessing the safety of a drug by recording adverse events have been poorly studied. It has been suggested that adverse events rather than adverse drug reactions should be monitored, since a reliable determination of which events
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Reporting of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) often is suboptimal. Cancer drug trials are complicated further by multiple survival and response endpoints. The authors of this report determined the frequency of reporting of timeβtoβevent endpoints and tumor re
## Abstract ## Background It has been proposed that objective cognitive testing provides additional information to that collected via adverse event (AE) recordings. However, in clinical trials of compounds with potentially negative effects on cognition, the results of cognitive testing may overlap