𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Geographical aspects of the uptake of renal replacement therapy in England

✍ Scribed by Martin, David ;Roderick, Paul ;Diamond, Ian ;Clements, Stephen ;Stone, Nicole


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
695 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
1077-3495

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Impact of the duration of posttransplant
✍ Hsin-Yun Sun; Thomas V. Cacciarelli; Marilyn M. Wagener; Nina Singh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 149 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Whether the duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) after liver transplantation influences the rate and types of bacterial infections is not known. In this study, 47 of 299 consecutive liver transplant recipients (16%) required posttransplant RRT. The incidence of bacterial infections was higher

The provision and practice of renal repl
✍ S. E. Wright; A. Bodenham; A. I. K. Short; J. H. Turney πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 95 KB

## Summary This study surveyed the availability and current practice of renal replacement therapy on adult general intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Questionnaires were returned from 236 units (89%). Renal replacement therapy was provided by 212 (90%) of responding units, treating 9442 pa

The implications of benefit package desi
✍ Phusit Prakongsai; Natasha Palmer; Preecha Uay-Trakul; Viroj Tangcharoensathien; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 154 KB

## Abstract When the Thai universal coverage (UC) scheme was established, the government decided to exclude renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients from the benefit package, though RRT was included in two other public health insurance schemes. Access to RRT for U

Bayesian analysis of the multivariate ge
✍ Juan J. Abellan; Daniela Fecht; Nicky Best; Sylvia Richardson; David J. Briggs πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 199 KB

## Abstract In this paper we analyse the geographical distribution of the __Indices of Deprivation 2004__, a set of seven area‐based indices measuring multiple dimensions of socio‐economic status (SES) related to income, employment, education, health, access to services and housing, crime, and livi