Abstract
The current classification of diffuse low‐grade gliomas is based mainly on histopathological criteria, which cannot accurately predict the highly variable clinical course observed in patients with such tumors. In an attempt to increase pathogenetic understanding of these tumors, we investigated 38 WHO Grade II astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas using a combination of G‐band chromosome analysis and high‐resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR‐CGH). Abnormal karyotypes were found in 41% of tumors. Karyotypes of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were near‐diploid whereas oligoastrocytomas also displayed near‐tetraploid clones. The most common aberrations were losses of chromosomes X, Y, 3, 4, 6, and 11 and gains of chromosomes 8 and 12. The only recurrent structural rearrangement was del(6)(q21). HR‐CGH analysis verified karyotyping findings but also revealed frequent losses at 1p, 17q, and 19q and gains of 7q, 10p, 11q, and 20p. Among the tumors were two gemistocytic astrocytomas, a subgroup of diffuse astrocytomas with a particular predisposition for progression but not studied cytogenetically before; one showed a near‐diploid, complex karyotype with structural aberrations of chromosomes 1, 3, and 11 whereas both displayed simple aberrations including loss of 11p by HR‐CGH. Our findings suggest that within diffuse low‐grade gliomas are genetically distinct entities that do not fit the currently used classification. In addition, tumors with complex chromosomal aberrations had a higher tendency for aggressive tumor behavior (shorter progression‐free survival) than tumors displaying simple aberrations only (P = 0.07). This could help identify genetic subsets of patients with low‐grade glioma who might benefit from early antineoplastic therapy. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.