๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Genetic diversity among sapoviruses

โœ Scribed by T. Farkas; W. M. Zhong; Y. Jing; P. W. Huang; S. M. Espinosa; N. Martinez; A. L. Morrow; G. M. Ruiz-Palacios; L. K. Pickering; X. Jiang

Book ID
106210233
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
283 KB
Volume
149
Category
Article
ISSN
1432-8798

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Genetic diversity of porcine sapoviruses
Genetic diversity of porcine sapoviruses
โœ Cheol Jeong; Sang-Ik Park; Sung-Hee Park; Ha-Hyun Kim; Su-Jin Park; Jae-Ho Jeong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 272 KB
Human sapoviruses: genetic diversity, re
Human sapoviruses: genetic diversity, recombination, and classification
โœ Grant S. Hansman; Tomoichiro Oka; Kazuhiko Katayama; Naokazu Takeda ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 182 KB

## Abstract The family __Caliciviridae__ contains four genera __Sapovirus__, __Norovirus__, __Lagovirus__ and __Vesivirus__, which include __Sapporo virus__ (SaV), __Norwalk virus__ (NoV), __Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus__ (RHDV) and __Feline calicivirus__ (FCV), respectively. SaV is a causative

Erratum: Human sapoviruses: genetic dive
Erratum: Human sapoviruses: genetic diversity, recombination, and classification
โœ Grant S. Hansman; Tomoichiro Oka; Kazuhiko Katayama; Naokazu Takeda ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 47 KB

## Abstract Reviews in Medical Virology 2007; 17: 133โ€“141 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.533 It has come to our attention that there was an error contained in the above article within Figure 1 on page 134. In the figure the strain called Cruise ship is classified as GII/3, it should have been classified as GI

Genetic diversity among Plantagos
Genetic diversity among Plantagos
โœ M. K. Dhar; A. K. Koul; A. Langer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 510 KB

In the progenies of the crosses between disomics and trisomies, two plants were isolated which carried an extra chromosome that was unlike any in the standard complement. The plants were not alike; while one carried a metacentric, the other had a telocentric extra chromosome. Their detailed structur