𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Genetic analysis of morphological variability in threePlantagospecies with different mating systems

✍ Scribed by K. Wolff


Publisher
Springer
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
832 KB
Volume
81
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-5752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Morphological variability in three Plantago species possessing different mating systems - P. Major, P. coronopus, and P. lanceolata - was analyzed. From each species several populations were analyzed. In comparing the species, it appeared that both the inbreeding P. major and the outbreeding P. lanceolata showed a high degree of morphological differentiation between populations. It was hypothesized that the absence of population differentiation for the species with a mixed mating system, P. coronopus, was caused by high adaptive plasticity. Plasticity is probably the predominant mechanism by which this species copes with different environments. There were considerable differences between populations within each species for their levels of variability and their heritabilities. It appeared that besides the influence of the mating system, selection may diminish morphological variability in the case of strong directional selection, especially in P. major and P. lanceolata.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Analysis of allozyme variability in thre
✍ K. Wolff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 796 KB

The level of electrophoretic variability in three Plantago species, P. major, P. coronopus, and P. lanceolata, was analyzed in relation to their breeding systems and compared with their morphological variability. From each species several populations were analyzed. The outcrossing P. lanceolata had

Different genetic pathways in the evolut
✍ Buerger, Horst; Otterbach, Friedrich; Simon, Ronald; SchοΏ½fer, Karl-Ludwig; Porem πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 265 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Invasive breast cancer shows a wide range of morphological differentiation, associated with differences in prognosis, but as yet, the underlying genetic mechanisms cannot be accounted for. In order to establish a model of the possible progression from the different subtypes of ductal carcinoma in si