๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

General systems theory and criminal justice

โœ Scribed by Thomas J. Bernard; Eugene A. Paoline III; Paul-Philippe Pare


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
137 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0047-2352

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Criminal justice agencies are organized sequentially -boutputQ from one agency is binputQ to the next -but most scholars argue that criminal justice is not a system in a theoretical sense. In this article, it is argued that general systems theory (GST) reveals important insights into criminal justice structures and functions. Specifically, it is argued that the criminal justice system processes bcasesQ rather than people, and that the common goal of criminal justice processing is to bclose cases so that they stay closed.Q It also is argued that processing capacity progressively declines, in that at each system point the subsequent agency cannot input as many cases as the previous agency can output. Each agency therefore experiences bbackward pressureQ to close cases in order to reduce input to the next agency. Overall, this article highlights that criminal justice agents and agencies are best understood as operating in the context of the larger whole, thus it is concluded that criminal justice is a system in the sense of general systems theory.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Criminal justice system behavior
โœ R. Gordon Cassidy; Ronald E. Turner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 838 KB
What is good criminal justice theory?
โœ John P. Crank; Blythe A. Bowman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 494 KB

This article assesses current work in criminal justice theory and identifies two criteria for theory-that which appeals to empirical validation, and that which appeals to historical tradition. Appeals to empirical validation are consistent with a scientific model, while appeals to historical traditi