The paper [1] purports to present a classification of the general failure sets of logic programs and a simple proof of the theorem on the soundness and completeness of the negation-as-failure rule. In this note we clarify some conflicting terminology between [1] and the papers [2, 3] to which it pre
β¦ LIBER β¦
General failure of logic programs
β Scribed by Van Tu Le
- Book ID
- 108016210
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 617 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0743-1066
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comments on βgeneral failure of logic pr
β
Joxan Jaffar; Jean-Louis Lassez; Michael J. Maher
π
Article
π
1986
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 258 KB
Negation-as-failure rule for general log
β
Van Tu Le
π
Article
π
1985
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 502 KB
Complete extension of general logic prog
β
Bernhard Gil
π
Article
π
1992
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 891 KB
Defeasible logic versus Logic Programmin
β
G. Antoniou; M.J. Maher; D. Billington
π
Article
π
2000
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 132 KB
Recently there has been increased interest in logic programming-based default reasoning approaches which are not using negation-as-failure in their object language. Instead, default reasoning is modelled by rules and a priority relation among them. In this paper we compare the expressive power of tw
Compiling defeasible inheritance network
β
Jia-Huai You; Xianchang Wang; Li Yan Yuan
π
Article
π
1999
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 217 KB
Failure and Equality in Functional Logic
β
F.J. LΓ³pez-Fraguas; J. SΓ‘nchez-HernΓ‘ndez
π
Article
π
2003
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 252 KB