Gene-dropping vs. empirical variance estimation for allele-sharing linkage statistics
✍ Scribed by Jeesun Jung; Daniel E. Weeks; Eleanor Feingold
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 520 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this study, we compare the statistical properties of a number of methods for estimating P‐values for allele‐sharing statistics in non‐parametric linkage analysis. Some of the methods are based on the normality assumption, using different variance estimation methods, and others use simulation (gene‐dropping) to find empirical distributions of the test statistics. For variance estimation methods, we consider the perfect variance approximation and two empirical variance estimates. The simulation‐based methods are gene‐dropping with and without conditioning on the observed founder alleles. We also consider the Kong and Cox linear and exponential models and a Monte Carlo method modified from a method for finding genome‐wide significance levels. We discuss the analytical properties of these various P‐value estimation methods and then present simulation results comparing them. Assuming that the sample sizes are large enough to justify a normality assumption for the linkage statistic, the best P‐value estimation method depends to some extent on the (unknown) genetic model and on the types of pedigrees in the sample. If the sample sizes are not large enough to justify a normality assumption, then gene‐dropping is the best choice. We discuss the differences between conditional and unconditional gene‐dropping. Genet. Epidemiol. 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.