𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Fuzzy measures and coherent join measures

✍ Scribed by Antonio Maturo


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
92 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0884-8173

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In assigning weights and scores in a decision problem usually we assume that they are finitely additive normalized measures, i.e., from the formal point of view, finitely additive probabilities. The normalization requirement sometimes appears as an actual restriction. For instance, it happens when the weights and scores can not be assigned in precise numerical terms or some logical and numerical issues arising from the given problem imply conditions that are different from the property of additivity. We must then consider extensions of the concept of probability. One, introduced by Zadeh, is to express the probabilities with fuzzy numbers; another extension, considered by Sugeno, Weber, and others, is first to replace the additivity with the condition of monotonicity, much weaker, and then to identify conditions "intermediate" between monotonicity and additivity. In any case, by assigning weights and scores, they must be consistent with the point of view considered. The conditions of consistency of finitely additive probabilities and their generalizations were discussed in several papers. This paper proposes an extension of the concept of finitely additive probability from a purely geometric point of view. Specifically, the environment of Euclidean Geometry, as de Finetti used to define the consistency of an assignment of probabilities, is replaced by the more general environment of Join Geometry by Prenowitz and Jantosciak. In this context, we introduce the concept of coherent join measure, i.e., normalized measure that is consistent with a join system, in particular, a join space or a join geometry. We show that decomposable measures with respect to a t-conorm are special cases of join coherent measures. Finally, we present some applications, significant special cases, and possible lines of research.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fuzzy coherence measures
✍ A. Sancho-Royo; J. L. Verdegay πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 125 KB

Coherence measures are a tool to compare those fuzzy sets that are sensitive to their own similarity as well as to their fuzzy nature. Within this article we can find three generalizations made about the definition of coherence measures: a first one for any fuzzy set, a second one for any definition

Fuzzy Measures and the Entropy of Fuzzy
✍ D. Dumitrescu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 390 KB

Using an additive fuzzy measure a notion of the entropy of a finite fuzzy partition has been defined [D. Dumitrescu, On fuzzy partitions, in "Itinerant Seminar on Functional Equations, Approximation and Convexity, Cluj-Napoca, 1983;" pp. 57-60; D. Dumitrescu and M. Barbu, Fuzzy entropy and processes

Inclusion measures, similarity measures,
✍ Wenyi Zeng; Hongxing Li πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 130 KB

The inclusion measure, the similarity measure, and the fuzziness of fuzzy sets are three important measures in fuzzy set theory. In this article, we investigate the relations among inclusion measures, similarity measures, and the fuzziness of fuzzy sets, prove eight theorems that inclusion measures,

Fuzzy Measures Defined by Fuzzy Integral
✍ Zhenyuan Wang; George J. Klir; Wei Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 192 KB

Given a measurable space X, F F , a fuzzy measure on X, F F , and a nonnegative function f on X that is measurable with respect to F F, we can define a new set Ε½ . function on X, F F by the fuzzy integral. It is known that is a lower Ε½ . semicontinuous fuzzy measure on X, F F and, moreover, if is fi

On hierarchically S-decomposable fuzzy m
✍ VicenΓ§ Torra πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 196 KB

In this work we introduce hierarchically decomposable fuzzy measures that allow the user to define measures more general than t-decomposable ones without having to deal with exponential complexity.