๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Fuzzy logarithmic least squares ranking method in analytic hierarchy process

โœ Scribed by Xu Ruoning; Zhai Xiaoyan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
529 KB
Volume
77
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-0114

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We have discussed the extensions of analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment and presented a procedure for constructing the fuzzy judgment matrix. This paper continues the discussion and goes further into the problem about extracting the fuzzy weights from the fuzzy judgment matrix by logarithmic least squares method, which is a main ranking method in analytic hierarchy process. First, we define the metric of the fuzzy judgment space and develop the expression form of logarithmic least squares method in fuzzy environment. Next, we derive the associated normal equations from the problem of fuzzy logarithmic least squares and prove that the solutions of fuzzy logarithmic least squares model are equivalent to the solutions of its normal equations. Finally, for every t e (0, I l, we can get its explicit solutions by solving the normal equations. The technique proposed in this paper is rather simple to realize and can be used for dealing with actual problems.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fuzzy least-squares priority method in t
โœ Ruoning Xu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 102 KB

The least-squares priority method is an e ective priority method in the analytic hierarchy process. But it is not appropriate under fuzziness. This paper is concerned with the question of estimation of weights of factors by least squares from a fuzzy judgment matrix. First, the expression form of le

Ranking by Eigenvector versus other meth
โœ T.L. Saaty; G. Hu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 315 KB

Counter-examples are given to show that in decision making, different methods of deriving priority vectors may be close for every single pairwise comparison matrix, yet they can lead to different overall rankings. When the judgments are inconsistent, their transitivity affects the final outcome, and