𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Fuzzy interval methods in investment risk appraisal

✍ Scribed by Antoaneta Serguieva; John Hunter


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
830 KB
Volume
142
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-0114

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Standard ΓΏnancial techniques neglect extreme situations and regards large market shifts as too unlikely to matter. This approach may account for what occurs most of the time in the market, but the picture it presents does not re ect the reality, as major events happen in the residual time and investors are 'surprised' by 'unexpected' market movements. An alternative fuzzy approach permits uctuations well beyond the probability type of uncertainty and allows one to make fewer assumptions about the data distribution and market behaviour. We suggest a fuzzy criterion, and subsequently derive a measure of the risk associated with each investment opportunity and an estimate of the projects' robustness towards market uncertainty. The procedure is applied to 35 UK companies traded on the London Stock Exchange. Finally, neural networks' capabilities of approximating the fuzzy appraisal function are investigated, as an initial step towards building a soft investment classiΓΏer based on the developed alternative ranking technique.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A method of inference in approximate rea
✍ Marian B. GorzaΕ‚czany πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 773 KB

This paper introduces and discusses a method of approximate inference which operates on the extension of the concept of a fuzzy set by the concept of an interval-valued fuzzy set. This method allows a formal, fuzzy representation to be built for verbal decision algorithms. Furthermore, it can have a

Simple methods for checking for possible
✍ Peter N. Lee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 95 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Meta-analyses of data from epidemiological studies are often based on odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) and their 95 per cent con"dence intervals (CIs) as reported by the authors. Where possible ORs, RRs and CIs should be checked against the source data. Some simple methods are presented for