๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function

โœ Scribed by Naheed Wali; Lawrence E. Leguire


Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
421 KB
Volume
84
Category
Article
ISSN
0012-4486

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted
โœ Naheed Wali; Lawrence E. Leguire ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ English โš– 631 KB

Dark-adapted electroretinograms were obtained over a 3.6-log range of stimulus intensities from 17 black and 15 white normal subjects. Subjects were grouped on the basis of light or dark fundus pigmentation, determined from digitized fundus photographs. B-wave amplitudes for each group were fitted b

Light adaptation and the luminance-respo
โœ Neal S. Peachey; Kenneth R. Alexander; Deborah J. Derlacki; Gerald A. Fishman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ English โš– 367 KB

Cone electroretinograms are typically isolated by presenting stimulus flashes against rod-desensitizing adapting fields. To investigate the manner in which adapting-field luminance affects cone electroretinogram response properties, we measured cone electroretinogram luminance-response functions of

Dark-adapted luminance-response function
โœ Naheed Wali; Lawrence E. Leguire ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ English โš– 378 KB

Normative dark-adapted electroretinograms were recorded simultaneously with a skin electrode and corneal electrode for varying stimulus intensities. The electroretinogram b-wave amplitudes for each electrode were fitted by the Naka-Rushton equation, and the parameters Vmax, K and n were evaluated. A

Abnormal spectral sensitivity of the ele
โœ K. Kawasaki; D. Yonemura; H. Nakazato; I. Kawaguchi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ English โš– 557 KB

The mean of the spectral sensitivity of the rapid off-response in the ERG is significantly lower at 560nm and longer wavelengths (p < 0.005) in protanopia and protanomalia, as compared with normal control subjects.