## Discussion D. Smith: I know spontaneous emission maximizes at about 90 ~ However, if B is present, amplification maximizes at about 0 ~ with respect to B. Rosenberg: No. D. Smith: According to Yip the growth rate maximizes along the magnetic field. Rosenberg" Direction of B does not make that
Fundamental wave of type III solar radio bursts and whistler waves
โ Scribed by T. Takakura
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 549 KB
- Volume
- 75
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0038-0938
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
It is demonstrated by a numerical simulation that both the whistler waves and plasma waves are excited by a common solar electron beam. The excitation of the whistler waves is ascribed to the loss-cone distribution which arises at a later phase of the passage of the beam at a given height due to a velocity dispersion in the electron beam with a finite length. It is highly probable that the fundamental of type III bursts are caused by the coalescence of the whistler waves and the plasma waves excited by a common electron beam, although the plasma waves must suffer induce scatterings by thermal ions to have small wave numbers before the coalescence to occur.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Numerical simulation of type III bursts is made by the use of fully numerical scheme showing a general rule for obtaining a numerically stable difference scheme. Although the electron distribution function is one-dimensional in velocity space, the plasma waves is cylindrically symmetric two-dimensio
Solar type III bursts have been observed at fixed frequencies of 18, 22, 26 and 36 MHz during the period 1970-1974. 103 profiles have been al~alyzed in the manner introduced by Aubier and . Boischot (1972) whose results are generally confirmed. Average values for the exciter function duration were f
Observations of type III burst profiles at 18, 22, 26 and 36 MHz, by Barrow and Achong (1975), are used to calculate the form of the exciter function. The burst profile is treated as the convolution of an exciter function and an exponential decay function. The average form of the exciter profile is