Fundamental progroupoid and bundles with a structural category
✍ Scribed by Sergio Ardanza-Trevijano; Luis-Javier Hernández-Paricio
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 970 KB
- Volume
- 92
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0166-8641
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this paper, for a given space X, a structural category C, and a faithful functor n from C to the category of spaces, we introduce a notion of (C, n)-bundle which contains as particular cases, the notions of covering space, of overlaying space (introduced by Fox), of suspension foliation and other well-known topological structures.
The new notion allows us to use sheaf theory and category theory in order to obtain some classification theorems which appear in terms of equivalences of categories. We prove that the category (C, q)-bundle(X) of (C, n)-bundles over X is equivalent to the category pro(6'X, C), which is determined by the fundamental groupoid of X and the structural category C. As particular cases we obtain the standard classification of covering spaces, Fox's classification theorem for overlays with a finite number of leaves and the standard classification of suspension foliations.
This paper illustrates the importance of the fundamental progroupoid of a space X, which plays in shape theory the role of the standard fundamental groupoid. If the space X satisfies some additional properties, the progroupoid 6'X can be reduced to a surjective progroup, a groupoid or a group. In some cases a surjective progroupoid can be replaced by a topological prodiscrete group. In all these cases the category pro(&X, C) also reduces to well-known categories.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this paper we describe how to give a particular global category of rings and modules the structure of a relaxed multicategory, and we describe an algebra in this relaxed multicategory such that vertex algebras appear as such algebras.
## Abstract Heat transfer coefficients were measured on tube bundles of fundamental layouts including in‐line layouts embedded horizontally in a liquid‐fluidized bed. Tested tube layouts were single tubes, transverse single tube rows, longitudinal single tube rows, and in‐line arranged tube bundles