## Abstract ## Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate morbidity, functional, and aesthetic outcomes in midface zygomaticomaxillary buttress reconstruction using the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF). ## Methods. A retrospective review of 24 consecutive patients that
Functional outcomes of fibula and osteocutaneous forearm free flap reconstruction for segmental mandibular defects
β Scribed by Frank W. Virgin; Tim A. Iseli; Claire E. Iseli; Jumin Sunde; William R. Carroll; Jeffery S. Magnuson; Eben L. Rosenthal
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 80 KB
- Volume
- 120
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0023-852X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objective/Hypothesis:
To demonstrate that the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap provides equivalent functional outcomes and improved morbidity compared to the fibular free flap in mandibular reconstruction.
Study Design:
Retrospective review.
Methods:
There were 168 patients requiring free flap reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects between January 2001 and December 2008. Mean followβup was 31 months for fibula free flap (FFF) (n = 117) and 20 months for osteocutaneous radial forearm free flaps (OCRFFF) (n = 51), reflecting an increasing use of forearms.
Results:
OCRFFF were more commonly used in older patients (mean 63.7 years vs. 59 years, P = .03). The majority (96.2%) of reconstruction was for malignant pathology. Flap failure was 3.4% for the fibula group and 3.9% in the forearm group. Malunion was infrequent (2.0% OCRFFF, 6.0% FFF, P = .26). Donor site complications were higher in the FFF group (4.3%) versus none in the OCRFF group (P = .13). Despite a high rate of longβterm survival in this patient population (75% at 5 years for carcinoma), dental implants were rarely placed (2.3% of patients) and were more common in forearm than fibula free flaps. Functional outcomes demonstrated no significant difference between groups with respect to oral diet (FFF 72.6% vs. OCRFFF 79.1%, P = .49) or retained enterogastric feeding tube (20.9% OCRFFF vs. 27.4% FFF, P = .49).
Conclusions:
Osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps provide comparable functional outcomes with less morbidity compared to fibula free flaps for selected segmental mandibulectomy defects. The overall dental implantation rate was low and more commonly performed in osteocutaneous radial forearm flaps compared to fibula flaps. Laryngoscope, 2010
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Head and neck oncologists are often confronted with the difficult challenge of balancing cancer cure with the preservation of function when deciding the patient's best treatment protocol. This task is especially difficult in cancer of the base of tongue. The purpose of th
Background. Full thickness defects of the cheek have been conventionally reconstructed using the folded forehead flap, cervical flap, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, or deltopectoral flap in various combinations. We report a modified technique of folding the radial forearm flap for reconstructio
## Abstract This study aims to compare donorβsite morbidity between the traditional fibula osteocutaneous and chimeric fibula flaps for mandibular reconstruction. Twentyβthree patients with head and neck cancer were recruited. Fifteen patients underwent the traditional fibula osteocutaneous flap. E
## Abstract ## Background: Historically, the prevention of functional morbidity after multimodal treatment for squamous cell carcinoma in patients with large base of tongue lesions has been challenging. The purpose of the present research is to report prospectively collected speech and swallowing